Table of Contents
Paper: Regenerative tourism – measuring to manage
Abstract
Measuring Regenerative Tourism. Regenerative tourism (RT) appears to be an idea whose time has come with it appearing as a key concept in many Destination Management Plans. But, how different is it from sustainable tourism? Importantly, if we are to support the sector what measures might be used to inform best practice and indicate when regenerative tourism has been achieved? This paper reports on the early stages of a pilot study to understand business and visitor understanding of (RT) and identify pathways to its implementation.
Access the full paper
Reflection on the paper
The Rise of Regenerative Tourism: A New Paradigm in Travel
Regenerative tourism (RT) is emerging as a transformative concept that has quickly become a central theme in Destination Management Plans across the globe. This shift reflects a growing recognition of the need to move beyond traditional approaches to tourism that focus solely on sustainability. While sustainable tourism has been instrumental in encouraging more responsible travel practices, its primary goal has often been to reduce negative impacts on the environment, local communities, and cultural heritage. Regenerative tourism, however, takes this a step further by aiming not just to mitigate harm but to actively contribute to the restoration, renewal, and enhancement of the environments and communities that tourism touches.
At its core, regenerative tourism seeks to create a net positive impact, meaning that the activities associated with tourism should leave a place better than it was before. This involves a deep commitment to improving natural ecosystems, reviving cultural traditions, and strengthening local economies in ways that are resilient and self-sustaining. Unlike sustainable tourism, which often emphasises minimising damage, regenerative tourism focuses on healing and regenerating the resources and relationships that tourism depends on. This includes fostering stronger connections between visitors and local communities, encouraging travelers to engage with destinations in meaningful ways that contribute to the well-being of both the environment and the people who live there.
Understanding the Differences Between Regenerative and Sustainable Tourism
The distinction between regenerative tourism and sustainable tourism lies in their underlying philosophies and objectives. Sustainable tourism typically operates within the framework of “doing less harm,” where the primary aim is to minimise the negative impacts of tourism activities. It promotes practices that reduce waste, conserve water and energy, protect wildlife, and preserve cultural heritage. While these efforts are crucial, they often operate within the limits of the status quo, seeking to maintain rather than enhance the current state of a destination.
Regenerative tourism, on the other hand, is rooted in the idea of “giving back” and “regenerating” the resources and systems that sustain tourism. It challenges the tourism industry to rethink its role and responsibility, urging stakeholders to consider how their actions can contribute to the long-term health and vitality of the places they visit. This might involve initiatives such as restoring damaged ecosystems, supporting local food systems, preserving and revitalising indigenous cultures, and investing in community-led development projects. In essence, regenerative tourism aspires to create a symbiotic relationship between tourism and the environment, where each supports and enriches the other.
Measuring Success in Regenerative Tourism
One of the critical challenges in advancing regenerative tourism is determining how to measure its success. Unlike sustainable tourism, which often relies on quantitative metrics like carbon footprint reduction, energy efficiency, and waste minimisation, regenerative tourism requires a more holistic and qualitative approach. Success in regenerative tourism might be gauged through indicators such as the restoration of natural habitats, the revitalisation of cultural practices, the empowerment of local communities, and the overall enhancement of visitor and resident well-being.
To support the tourism sector in adopting regenerative practices, it is essential to develop clear guidelines and benchmarks that can inform best practices. These might include frameworks for assessing the regenerative potential of tourism activities, tools for monitoring and evaluating progress, and case studies that highlight successful examples of regenerative tourism in action. Moreover, engaging local communities and stakeholders in the development and implementation of regenerative tourism initiatives is crucial, as their knowledge and insights are invaluable in identifying what regeneration looks like in their specific context.
Pilot Study: Exploring Business and Visitor Perceptions
This paper presents the early findings of a pilot study designed to explore the awareness and understanding of regenerative tourism among businesses and visitors. The study seeks to answer key questions: Do businesses and tourists understand what regenerative tourism entails? What are the perceived benefits and challenges of adopting regenerative practices? And, crucially, what pathways can be identified to facilitate the successful implementation of regenerative tourism?
Initial insights from the pilot study suggest that while there is growing interest in regenerative tourism, there is also a need for greater clarity and education around its principles and practices. Businesses, in particular, may require support in transitioning from sustainable to regenerative models, including access to resources, training, and partnerships that can help them integrate regenerative practices into their operations.
Visitors, on the other hand, show a willingness to engage with regenerative tourism but may lack the knowledge or opportunities to do so effectively. This highlights the importance of creating educational and experiential offerings that allow travelers to actively participate in regenerative activities, such as conservation projects, cultural exchanges, and community-based tourism initiatives.
Conclusion
The shift towards regenerative tourism represents a profound evolution in how we think about travel and its impact on the world. By moving beyond sustainability to embrace regeneration, the tourism industry has the potential to become a powerful force for positive change. However, realising this potential will require a concerted effort to educate and engage both businesses and visitors, develop robust frameworks for measuring success, and foster collaboration across sectors and communities. The findings of this pilot study are just the beginning of a broader exploration into how regenerative tourism can be effectively implemented and scaled, paving the way for a future where tourism not only sustains but actively enriches the places we love to visit.